Ban the box update

As I noted in my last post, this week is devoted to checking on the status of legislation affecting  ex-offenders.

One of the more effective strategies — and one that seems to be  gaining steam —  is the  “Ban the Box” grassroots campaign.  The box, of course,  is that section of the employment application that asks about whether you have a criminal record.  The question can come in a variety of forms as  blogger James Walker notes in his very comprehensive post. Sometimes it’s even a series of questions, as I discovered when my son recently applied at our local grocery store for a job as a bag boy.  These are usually yes/no questions, typically followed by a space where you’re asked to explain any charges in further detail.

The problem is that once you check “Yes,” your application often goes no further.  One human resources professional recently told me  that in cases where someone answered yes in an online application at his former employer, the application was automatically deleted. 

Since 2003, some 30 cities states and counties have eliminated the box and the question from applications.  These include:

    Hawaii (1998), Minnesota (2009) and New Mexico, this year.  Just last month,  Connecticut passed a law removing the box from applications for public jobs.  Bills are also pending in Wisconsin and Nebraska.   Major cities that have banned the box for government jobs include San Francisco, Chicago, Boston and Minneapolis/St. Paul.   

The National Employment Law Project offers a comprehensive update by state and city.  The Safer Foundation also provides a detailed list of recent legislation. 

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under background checks, companies hiring ex-offenders, criminal records, employers hiring ex-offenders, employment ex-offenders, job search ex-offenders, jobs ex-offenders

2 responses to “Ban the box update

  1. Michael Sweig

    Please contact me. I’d love to talk about a lot things, among them terminology: “ex-offender” has some alternatives that don’t define the person by the offense.

    Michael Sweig
    Public Policy Liaison
    Safer Foundation
    Chicago

    msweig@ymail.com
    michaelsweig.wordpress.com
    skype: 773-360-0404

    • Michael,
      You’ve got a good point on terminology and I’d love to discuss a better lable than ex-offenders, since it can have a negative and sometimes even inaccurate connotation. I’ve sent you a private message and look forward to talking soon.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s